Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10179
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOJHA, MEGHAen_US
dc.contributor.authorShigwan, Bhushan K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNerlekar, Ashish N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDatar, Mandar N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCHAVAN, BHANUDAS P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBARUA, DEEPAKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-13T06:00:05Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-13T06:00:05Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationEcological Applications, 35(03).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-5582en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70035en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10179-
dc.description.abstractBiological invasions pose a threat to biodiversity in tropical savannas. Invasive plants can alter savanna communities in complex ways, where impacts can vary with the intensity of invasion, the spatial scales examined, and by climate. However, our understanding of such impacts on Asian tropical savannas is limited. To address this knowledge gap, we examined how plant invasion impacted plant communities across increasing levels of invasion, at different spatial scales, in two climatically determined savannas in tropical India. We sampled vegetation at three sites each in drier fine-leaf savannas (FLS) and wetter broadleaf savannas (BLS). At each site, we sampled replicate locations with plots assigned to uninvaded savannas, invaded savannas at three invasion levels, and old-growth savannas that served as a benchmark for comparison. We quantified alpha and beta plant diversity, and differences in community composition that were partitioned into components representative of species loss and replacement. We found that while richness and diversity decreased linearly, evenness increased linearly with invasion. The loss of species was much greater in BLS (60%) than in FLS (30%). Differences in composition with invasion were more pronounced in BLS and driven by species turnover in both savannas. We did not find evidence for homogenization at larger spatial scales, with no differences in beta diversity in FLS and an increase in BLS with invasion. These results highlight the utility of examining multiple measures of diversity, as they provide insights into how relationships between richness and evenness can translate into diversity. The linear nature of responses of the community to increasing invasion suggests that management efforts may be equally effective at different stages of invasion in these savannas. Further, the observed increase in beta diversity in invaded BLS communities adds to the growing reports of spatial scale-dependent effects and reinforces the need to examine invasion at multiple spatial scales. Overall, the greater loss of species and pronounced community changes in BLS, which is the dominant savanna type in the Indian subcontinent and home to many endemic species, suggest that it should be prioritized for conservation, management, and future restoration.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectAsian tropical savannaen_US
dc.subjectAlpha diversityen_US
dc.subjectBeta diversityen_US
dc.subjectComposition changeen_US
dc.subjectInvasive speciesen_US
dc.subjectnNestednessen_US
dc.subjectTurnoveren_US
dc.subject2025-JUN-WEEK2en_US
dc.subjectTOC-JUN-2025en_US
dc.subject2025en_US
dc.titleDifferential impacts of invasion on plant communities of two types of savannas in Indiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleEcological Applicationsen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.