Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10377
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaddillaya, Nehaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRao, Aksharen_US
dc.contributor.authorShrivastava, Anshulen_US
dc.contributor.authorJamir, Imnatoshien_US
dc.contributor.authorSENGUPTA, KUNDANen_US
dc.contributor.authorGundiah, Namrataen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-29T09:52:42Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-29T09:52:42Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBiointerphases, 20(04).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1559-4106en_US
dc.identifier.issn1934-8630en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1116/6.0004585en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10377-
dc.description.abstractMechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) modulate cell–substrate interactions and influence cellular behaviors such as contractility, migration, and proliferation. Although the effects of substrate stiffness on mechanobiology have been well studied, the role of ECM viscoelasticity in fibrotic progression remains less understood. To examine how viscoelasticity affects the biophysical properties and regulates signaling of human mammary fibroblasts, we engineered elastic (E) and viscoelastic (VE) polyacrylamide hydrogels with comparable storage moduli (∼14.52 ± 1.03 kPa) but distinctly different loss moduli; mean loss moduli for VE gels was 36.9% higher at 0.05 Hz than E gels. Fibroblasts cultured on E hydrogels spread extensively (2428.93 ± 864.71 μm2), developed prominent stress fibers with higher zyxin intensity, and generated higher traction stresses (2931.57 ± 1732.61 Pa). In contrast, fibroblasts on VE substrates had 54.2% smaller focal adhesion areas, exhibited 51.8% lower critical adhesion strengths, and generated 21% lower traction stresses (p < 0.001). These substrates also promoted migration and showed enhanced proliferation with reduced Yes-associated protein (YAP) activity, suggesting a mechanotransduction shift that may involve alternative signaling pathways. In contrast, E substrates showed YAP nuclear translocation, consistent with greater cytoskeletal tension and contractility. These findings highlight the importance of energy dissipation mechanisms in regulating fibroblast function on substrates mimicking the fibrotic milieu. Our results demonstrate that tuning the ECM viscoelasticity is a useful strategy to regulate cell behaviors in tissue-engineered scaffolds and develop better disease modeling for regenerative medicine.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAIP Publishingen_US
dc.subjectStiffnessen_US
dc.subjectProliferationen_US
dc.subjectElasticityen_US
dc.subjectFibrosisen_US
dc.subjectModulusen_US
dc.subjectCultureen_US
dc.subjectYap/Tazen_US
dc.subjectGrowthen_US
dc.subjectCellsen_US
dc.subjectZyxinen_US
dc.subject2025-AUG-WEEK4en_US
dc.subjectTOC-AUG-2025en_US
dc.subject2025en_US
dc.titleSubstrate viscoelasticity regulates fibroblast adhesion and migrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleBiointerphasesen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.