Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10597
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNerlekar, Ashish N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPATIL, DIGVIJAYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T11:41:46Z
dc.date.available2025-12-19T11:41:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationPeople and Nature, 8(01).en_US
dc.identifier.issn2575-8314en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70201en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10597
dc.description.abstract1.The ecological history of tropical savannas remains a subject of intense debate and of high conservation relevance. Despite emerging evidence suggesting the antiquity of tropical savannas, the misconception that all tropical savannas are products of anthropogenic deforestation still dominates public and policy spheres. Clarifying this misconception among the public and policymakers is a time-sensitive challenge and thus necessitates utilizing culturally resonant and interdisciplinary approaches. 2. In this study, we use nature descriptions in traditional literature to triangulate the ecological history of tropical savannas in western Maharashtra, India—a region where savannas continue to be devalued as degraded forests by conservation practitioners, policymakers, and the general public. Specifically, we test the popular claim of the recent anthropogenic origin of India's savannas using data from traditional literature and other lines of evidence. 3. We reviewed biographies, hagiographies, myths, narrative poems, and folk songs composed in Marathi language and dated between the 13th and 20th century CE to identify 28 relevant excerpts. From these excerpts, we collated georeferenced landscape descriptions alongside occurrences of plants. Using botanical literature, we classified these plants as savanna indicators, forest indicators, generalists (i.e. occurring in both savannas and forests), and cultivated plants. Finally, we use this botanical classification and qualitative landscape descriptions to reconstruct ecological history. 4. We found that descriptions of both the landscape and specific plants point to an open-canopy savanna in the past rather than a forest. Of the 44 wild plant species recorded (i.e. omitting exclusively cultivated plants), a clear majority (27 species) were savanna indicators, 14 were generalists, and only three were forest indicators. Our ecological reconstructions from traditional literature complement data from archival paintings, revenue records, plant and animal fossils, and dated molecular phylogenies of endemic biodiversity—all attesting to the antiquity of India's savannas. 5. Policy implications: We urge conservation practitioners and policymakers to pay heed to emerging data from multiple lines of evidence—including nature descriptions in traditional literature—that clarify the ancient origins of tropical savannas. Reframing biodiversity conservation initiatives in tropical savannas—many of which are sacred natural sites—by explicitly valuing traditional literature as archives of biocultural histories could catalyse the conservation of both nature and culture.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBritish Ecological Societyen_US
dc.subjectConservationen_US
dc.subjectCultural historyen_US
dc.subjectFolkloreen_US
dc.subjectGrasslanden_US
dc.subjectMaharashtraen_US
dc.subjectReligious studiesen_US
dc.subject2025-DEC-WEEK2en_US
dc.subjectTOC-DEC-2025en_US
dc.subject2025en_US
dc.titleUtilizing traditional literature to triangulate the ecological history of a tropical savannaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitlePeople and Natureen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.