Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10978
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVilla, Stefano-
dc.contributor.authorKURPATI RAGHAVENDRA, KISHAN-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-14T11:54:15Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-14T11:54:15Z-
dc.date.issued2026-05-
dc.identifier.citation76en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10978-
dc.description.abstractEpithelial monolayers serve fundamental physiological roles in development, homeostasis, and disease; yet how collective cell dynamics and substrate mechanics coordinate to drive three-dimensional morphogenesis remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate how substrate mechanics and pharmacological modulation of cell motility and contractility influence monolayer dynamics, dome formation kinetics, and cell adhesion in MDCKII epithelial cells. Using epifluorescence and spinning disk confocal microscopy, we tracked monolayer dynamics and dome formation on glass, PDMS, and uniform or micropatterned protein coatings. Quantitative analysis of velocity fields revealed a transient motility peak 55-67 hours post-seeding. HGF increased peak velocities in a dose-dependent manner, while blebbistatin suppressed motility and contractility without altering adhesion strength. Blebbistatin-treated cells formed smaller domes that collapsed gradually rather than suddenly, with rapid dome turnover and shorter lifetimes. In contrast, PDMS—which reduces adhesion while increasing motility—produced larger domes with collapse dynamics similar to controls. Confocal imaging revealed that dome collapse involves transient loss of actin stress fibers in dome cells, which are then pulled outward by contractile neighbors before repolarizing and migrating back—a recovery abolished by blebbistatin. Centrifugation-based adhesion assays quantified substrate-specific detachment thresholds.[SV1.1][KK1.2] These findings reveal that monolayer motility and dome kinetics are governed by interplay between actomyosin contractility, cell motility, and substrate adhesion, with implications for understanding epithelial morphogenesis, tissue mechanics, and biomaterial design.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipI am immensely thankful to my supervisor and guide, Dr. Stefano Villa, for his continuous and consistent feedback and input on all my experiments. I also thank him for several of the analyses credited to him in this thesis. I am grateful to Sidharth Das, a friend and labmate, for his valuable feedback. I am deeply grateful to the lab technicians—Ms. Katharina Gunkel, Ms. Maren Stella Müller, and Ms. Lara Ständer—for taking care of the cells and the lab, and for their weekly assistance with my experiments. I acknowledge the Machine Shop at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPI-DS), and particularly Mr. Andy Heil, for helping us build our custom cell adhesion assay setup. I am thankful to Dr. Mišo Mitkovski and Mr. Heiko Röhse for their expertise and technical assistance at the Facility for Light Microscopy at the Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences (MPI-NAT), City Campus, for multiphoton and confocal microscopy. I also thank the Facility for Light Microscopy for access to software tools such as Arivis and Nikon NIS Elements for analysis. I would also like to thank Ms. Angela Gremmel at MPI-DS for helping with all the bureaucracy in Germany and MPI-DS. I thank MPI-DS and the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, for the opportunity to pursue this master's thesis, and MPI-DS for financial support for my stay. I acknowledge the receipt of the Kishore Vaigyanik Protsahan Yojana (KVPY) fellowship.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectmechanobiologyen_US
dc.subjecttissue morphogenesisen_US
dc.subjectthird harmonic generation (THG)en_US
dc.subjectsecond harmonic generation (SHG)en_US
dc.subjectmicropatterningen_US
dc.subjectfluid shear stressen_US
dc.subjectcell-substrate adhesionen_US
dc.subjectEpithelial mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectMDCKII cellsen_US
dc.subjectdome formationen_US
dc.subjectautofluorescenceen_US
dc.subjectcell motilityen_US
dc.subjectactomyosin contractilityen_US
dc.subjectblebbistatinen_US
dc.subjectPDMSen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the Role of Cellular Dynamics in MDCKII Domes Formationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.description.embargoNo Embargoen_US
dc.type.degreeBS-MSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.registration20211273en_US
Appears in Collections:MS THESES

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20211273_KISHAN_KURPATI_RAGHAVENDRA_MS_Thesis.pdfMS Thesis11.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.