Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11065
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPadalkar, Shamin-
dc.contributor.authorROY, BIKRAM JYOTI-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-19T11:45:14Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-19T11:45:14Z-
dc.date.issued2026-05-
dc.identifier.citation120en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11065-
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding cell division requires students to interrelate multiple interacting biological entities across spatial and temporal scales. However, students often represent the process as a sequence of stages rather than as a coordinated system of interacting structures. This study examines how students structure their representations and explanations of cell division within an instructional sequence integrating kinesthetic enactment, yarn-based modelling, and paper-strip modelling across two design iterations using a Design-Based Research framework. Worksheet responses from 41 Grade 11 students across two iterations and 50 semi-structured interview episodes were analysed using a multidimensional coding framework capturing Embodied Mediation (EM), Representational Structure (RS), Explanation Form (EF), and Canonical Alignment (CA). Pre- and post-test scores showed substantial learning gains in both iterations (Iteration 1: Cohen's d = 1.60; Iteration 2: Cohen's d = 0.63, reflecting a ceiling effect). Structurally, student representations shifted from sequential stage-based organisation toward coordinated relational structures during modelling-intensive phases. Earlier integration of modelling in Iteration 2 produced markedly more coordinated representations at the meiosis phase (78.9% vs. 5.6% in Iteration 1). Explanatory reasoning stabilised at the dependency-based level across both iterations, with mechanism-based explanation remaining rare (6.4% of worksheet responses) and emerging only when representational scaffolding was combined with counterfactual probing. Embodied mediation supported representational coordination but did not independently generate mechanistic articulation — a dissociation that persisted across both datasets. These findings indicate that embodied pedagogy functions primarily as a structural scaffold rather than a direct route to causal understanding, and that bridging representational coordination to mechanistic explanation requires an additional layer of entity-level instructional scaffolding.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCell divisionen_US
dc.subjectEmbodied cognitionen_US
dc.subjectModel-based learningen_US
dc.subjectRepresentational competenceen_US
dc.subjectMechanistic reasoningen_US
dc.subjectKinesthetic enactmenten_US
dc.titleChoreographing the Cell – Fostering Understanding of Cell Division through an Embodied, Model-Based Pedagogyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoOne Yearen_US
dc.type.degreeBS-MSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOther Departmenten_US
dc.contributor.registration20211194en_US
Appears in Collections:MS THESES

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20211194_BIKRAM_JYOTI_ROY_MS_THESIS.pdfMS Thesis5.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.