Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11065Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Padalkar, Shamin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | ROY, BIKRAM JYOTI | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-19T11:45:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-19T11:45:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 120 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11065 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Understanding cell division requires students to interrelate multiple interacting biological entities across spatial and temporal scales. However, students often represent the process as a sequence of stages rather than as a coordinated system of interacting structures. This study examines how students structure their representations and explanations of cell division within an instructional sequence integrating kinesthetic enactment, yarn-based modelling, and paper-strip modelling across two design iterations using a Design-Based Research framework. Worksheet responses from 41 Grade 11 students across two iterations and 50 semi-structured interview episodes were analysed using a multidimensional coding framework capturing Embodied Mediation (EM), Representational Structure (RS), Explanation Form (EF), and Canonical Alignment (CA). Pre- and post-test scores showed substantial learning gains in both iterations (Iteration 1: Cohen's d = 1.60; Iteration 2: Cohen's d = 0.63, reflecting a ceiling effect). Structurally, student representations shifted from sequential stage-based organisation toward coordinated relational structures during modelling-intensive phases. Earlier integration of modelling in Iteration 2 produced markedly more coordinated representations at the meiosis phase (78.9% vs. 5.6% in Iteration 1). Explanatory reasoning stabilised at the dependency-based level across both iterations, with mechanism-based explanation remaining rare (6.4% of worksheet responses) and emerging only when representational scaffolding was combined with counterfactual probing. Embodied mediation supported representational coordination but did not independently generate mechanistic articulation — a dissociation that persisted across both datasets. These findings indicate that embodied pedagogy functions primarily as a structural scaffold rather than a direct route to causal understanding, and that bridging representational coordination to mechanistic explanation requires an additional layer of entity-level instructional scaffolding. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cell division | en_US |
| dc.subject | Embodied cognition | en_US |
| dc.subject | Model-based learning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Representational competence | en_US |
| dc.subject | Mechanistic reasoning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Kinesthetic enactment | en_US |
| dc.title | Choreographing the Cell – Fostering Understanding of Cell Division through an Embodied, Model-Based Pedagogy | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.description.embargo | One Year | en_US |
| dc.type.degree | BS-MS | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Other Department | en_US |
| dc.contributor.registration | 20211194 | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | MS THESES | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20211194_BIKRAM_JYOTI_ROY_MS_THESIS.pdf | MS Thesis | 5.57 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.