Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11125
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBhaskar, Umang-
dc.contributor.authorGUPTA, AASTHA-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-21T10:46:23Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-21T10:46:23Z-
dc.date.issued2026-05-
dc.identifier.citation63en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11125-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis presents a comprehensive empirical analysis of two prominent fair division algorithms deployed in real-world platforms: the Maximum Nash Welfare (MNW) algorithm for indivisible goods allocation (Spliddit platform) and the Adjusted Winner (AW) algorithm for household chore division (Kajibuntan platform). We evaluate both algorithms across eight fairness and efficiency metrics including envy-freeness (EF, EF1, EFX), proportionality (PROP), maximin share (MMS), equitability (EQ, EQ1), and Pareto optimality (PO).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectFair Divisionen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectPareto Optimalen_US
dc.titleFairness and Efficiency in Fair Division: An Empirical Analysis of Mechanisms for Fair Allocationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoOne Yearen_US
dc.type.degreeBS-MSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Data Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.registration20211211en_US
Appears in Collections:MS THESES

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20211211_AASTHA_GUPTA_MS_Thesis.pdfMS Thesis758.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.