Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1858
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSUBRAMANIAN, PRASADen_US
dc.contributor.authorCairns, Iveren_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-14T06:46:09Z
dc.date.available2019-02-14T06:46:09Z
dc.date.issued2011-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research,116(A3), A03104.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0148-0227en_US
dc.identifier.issn2156-2202en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1858-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015864en_US
dc.description.abstract[1] We seek to reconcile observations of small source sizes in the solar corona at 327 MHz with predictions of scattering models that incorporate refractive index effects, inner scale effects, and a spherically diverging wavefront. We use an empirical prescription for the turbulence amplitude CN2(R) based on very long baseline interferometry observations by Spangler et al. of compact radio sources against the solar wind for heliocentric distances R ≈ 10–50 R⊙. We use the Coles and Harmon model for the inner scale li(R), which is presumed to arise from cyclotron damping. In view of the prevalent uncertainty in the power law index that characterizes solar wind turbulence at various heliocentric distances, we retain this index as a free parameter. We find that the inclusion of spherical divergence effects suppresses the predicted source size substantially. We also find that inner scale effects significantly reduce the predicted source size. An important general finding for solar sources is that the calculations substantially underpredict the observed source size. Three possible, nonexclusive, interpretations of this general result are proposed. First and simplest, future observations with better angular resolution will detect much smaller sources. Consistent with this, previous observations of small sources in the corona at metric wavelengths are limited by the instrument resolution. Second, the spatially varying level of turbulence CN2(R) is much larger in the inner corona than predicted by straightforward extrapolation sunward of the empirical prescription, which was based on observations between 10 and 50 R⊙. Either the functional form or the constant of proportionality could be different. Third, perhaps the inner scale is smaller than the model, leading to increased scattering. These results and interpretations are discussed and compared with earlier work.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.subjectCoronal turbulence modelsen_US
dc.subject327 MHzen_US
dc.subjectScattering modelsen_US
dc.subjectRefractive scattering of radiationen_US
dc.subjectAngular Broadeningen_US
dc.subject2011en_US
dc.titleConstraints on coronal turbulence models from source sizes of noise storms at 327 MHzen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleJournal of Geophysical Researchen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.