Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2529
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, C. S. Sudheeren_US
dc.contributor.authorShukla, Abhisheken_US
dc.contributor.authorMAHESH, T. S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-26T09:15:22Z
dc.date.available2019-04-26T09:15:22Z
dc.date.issued2016-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationPhysics Letters A, 380(43), 3612-3616.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0375-9601en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2529-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.09.004en_US
dc.description.abstractQuantum state after measuring a degenerate observable is given by Lüders and von Neumann state update rules. While the former preserves superpositions, the latter does not. Even though both rules are valid and realizable, which rule a given measuring device (“Black Box”) obeys, depends on its internal details. Recently Hegerfeldt and Mayato (2012) [5] had formulated a protocol to discriminate between the two kinds of measuring devices. Here we have reformulated this protocol for system and measuring qubits. We then experimentally investigated this protocol on an NMR spectrometer, and found that Lüders rule is favoured.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.subjectLuders and von Neumannen_US
dc.subjectNMR investigationen_US
dc.subjectFour-qubit NMR systemen_US
dc.subjectNeumann measuring deviceen_US
dc.subject2016en_US
dc.titleDiscriminating between Lüders and von Neumann measuring devices: An NMR investigationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitlePhysics Letters Aen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.