Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4267
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSOHONI, PUSHKARen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-24T11:54:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-24T11:54:23Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 28(4), 645-659.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1356-1863en_US
dc.identifier.issn1474-0591en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4267-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186318000214en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the medieval world of Islamic kingdoms, the Friday sermon in the name of the reigning sultan (khutba) and the striking of coins (sikka) have been thought of as universal declarations of sovereignty. Yet, the sultanates of the Deccan that succeeded the Bahmani kingdom did not strike their own coins for almost a century after they had declared sovereign status. Therefore, two important issues are present here. First, the axiom of sovereign status for Islamic monarchs does have exceptions. Second, the circumstances surrounding the non-issue of coin, by these kingdoms, needs explanation. Similarly, the reasons why they all start to mint their own coins in the last quarter of the sixteenth century is also addressed. Mughal monetary policy is an essential element in this history.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.subjectHumanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.subject2018en_US
dc.titleThe Non-issue of Coinage: The Monetary Policies of the Post-Bahmani Sultanatesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleJournal of the Royal Asiatic Societyen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.