Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5222
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDey, Snigdhadipen_US
dc.contributor.authorGOSWAMI, BEDARTHAen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Amitabhen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T07:06:51Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-20T07:06:51Z-
dc.date.issued2014-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Theoretical Biology, 345, 52-60.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-5193en_US
dc.identifier.issn1095-8541en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5222-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.12.005en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough the effects of dispersal on the dynamics of two-patch metapopulations are well studied, potential interactions between local dynamics and asymmetric dispersal remain unexplored. We examined the dynamics of two Ricker models coupled by symmetric or asymmetric constant-fraction dispersal at different rates. Unlike previous studies, we extensively sampled the r1−r2 space and found that stability of the coupled system was markedly affected by interactions between dispersal (in terms of strength and asymmetry) and local dynamics. When both subpopulations were intrinsically chaotic, increased symmetry in the exchange of individuals had a greater stabilizing impact on the dynamics of the system. When one subpopulation showed considerably more unstable dynamics than the other, higher asymmetry in the exchange of individuals had a stabilizing or destabilizing effect on the dynamics depending on whether the net dispersal bias was from the relatively stable to the relatively unstable subpopulation, or vice versa. The sensitivity of chaotic dynamics to stabilization due to dispersal varied with r-value in the chaotic subpopulation. Under unidirectional or bidirectional symmetric dispersal, when one subpopulation was intrinsically chaotic and the other had stable dynamics, the stabilization of chaotic subpopulations with r~3.3–4.0 occurred at the lowest dispersal rates, followed by chaotic subpopulations with r~2.7–2.95 and, finally, chaotic subpopulations with r~2.95–3.3. The mechanism for this pattern is not known but might be related to the range and number of different attainable population sizes possible in different r-value zones.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.subjectRicker modelen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.subjectStabilizationen_US
dc.subjectPeriodicityen_US
dc.subjectChaosen_US
dc.subject2014en_US
dc.titleEffects of symmetric and asymmetric dispersal on the dynamics of heterogeneous metapopulations: Two-patch systems revisiteden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleJournal of Theoretical Biologyen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.