Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5346
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMITTAL, K. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGiraud, O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorUllmo, D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T09:49:52Z
dc.date.available2020-11-09T09:49:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Review E, 102(4).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1539-3755en_US
dc.identifier.issn1550-2376en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5346-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.042211en_US
dc.description.abstractSemiclassical mechanics allows for a description of quantum systems which preserves their phase information, and thus interference effects, while using only the system's classical dynamics as an input. In particular one of the strengths of a semiclassical description is to present a coherent picture which (to negligible higher-order ℏ corrections) is independent of the particular canonical coordinates used. However, this coherence relies heavily on the use of the stationary phase approximation. It turns out, however, that in some important cases, a brutal application of stationary phase approximation washes out all interference, and thus quantum, effects. In this paper, we address this issue in detail in one of its simplest instantiations, namely the evaluation of the time evolution of the expectation value of an operator. We explain why it is necessary to include contributions which are not in the neighborhood of stationary points and provide new semiclassical expressions for the evolution of the expectation values. The efficiency of our approach is based on the fact that we treat analytically all the integrals that can be performed within the stationary phase approximation, implying that the remaining integrals are simple integrals, in the sense that the integrand has no significant variations on the quantum scale (and thus they are very easy to perform numerically). This to be contrasted with other approaches such as the ones based on initial value representation, popular in chemical and molecular physics, which avoid a root search for the classical dynamics, but at the cost of performing numerically integrals whose evaluation requires a sampling on the quantum scale, and which are therefore not well designed to address the deep semiclassical regime. Along the way, we get a deeper understanding of the origin of these interference effects and an intuitive geometric picture associated with them.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Societyen_US
dc.subjectPhase-Spaceen_US
dc.subjectDynamicsen_US
dc.subject2020en_US
dc.subject2020-NOV-WEEK2en_US
dc.subjectTOC-NOV-2020en_US
dc.titleSemiclassical evaluation of expectation valuesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitlePhysical Review Een_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.