Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5660
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSELVESHWARI, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLELE, KASTURIen_US
dc.contributor.authorDEY, SUTIRTHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-01T04:08:25Z
dc.date.available2021-03-01T04:08:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 34(6), 953-967.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1010-061Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1420-9101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5660
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13764en_US
dc.description.abstractPhysiological states can determine the ability of organisms to handle stress. Does this mean that the same selection pressure will lead to different evolutionary outcomes, depending on the organisms’ physiological state? If yes, what will be the genomic signatures of such adaptation(s)? We used experimental evolution in Escherichia coli followed by whole‐genome whole‐population sequencing to investigate these questions. The sensitivity of Escherichia coli to ultraviolet (UV) radiation depends on the growth phase during which it experiences the radiation. We evolved replicate E. coli populations under two different conditions of UV exposures, namely exposure during the lag and the exponential growth phases. Initially, the UV sensitivity of the ancestor was greater during the exponential phase than the lag phase. However, at the end of 100 cycles of exposure, UV resistance evolved to similar extents in both treatments. Genome analysis showed that mutations in genes involved in DNA repair, cell membrane structure and RNA polymerase were common in both treatments. However, different functional groups were found mutated in populations experiencing lag and exponential UV treatment. In the former, genes involved in transcriptional and translational regulations and cellular transport were mutated, whereas the latter treatment showed mutations in genes involved in signal transduction and cell adhesion. Interestingly, the treatments showed no phenotypic differences in a number of novel environments. Taken together, these results suggest that selection pressures at different physiological stages can lead to differences in the genomic signatures of adaptation, which need not necessarily translate into observable phenotypic differences.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectAntibiotic resistanceen_US
dc.subjectEvolve and resequenceen_US
dc.subjectExponential phaseen_US
dc.subjectLag phaseen_US
dc.subjectUV damageen_US
dc.subject2021-FEB-WEEK4en_US
dc.subjectTOC-FEB-2021en_US
dc.subject2021en_US
dc.titleGenomic signatures of UV resistance evolution in Escherichia coli depend on the growth phase during exposureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleJournal of Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.