Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6285
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan, Kuan Pernen_US
dc.contributor.authorKANITKAR, TEJASHREE RAJARAMen_US
dc.contributor.authorKwoh, Chee Keongen_US
dc.contributor.authorMADHUSUDHAN, M. S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-27T07:06:51Z
dc.date.available2021-09-27T07:06:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 8, 646288.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-889Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6285
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.646288en_US
dc.description.abstractPredicting the functional consequences of single point mutations has relevance to protein function annotation and to clinical analysis/diagnosis. We developed and tested Packpred that makes use of a multi-body clique statistical potential in combination with a depth-dependent amino acid substitution matrix (FADHM) and positional Shannon entropy to predict the functional consequences of point mutations in proteins. Parameters were trained over a saturation mutagenesis data set of T4-lysozyme (1,966 mutations). The method was tested over another saturation mutagenesis data set (CcdB; 1,534 mutations) and the Missense3D data set (4,099 mutations). The performance of Packpred was compared against those of six other contemporary methods. With MCC values of 0.42, 0.47, and 0.36 on the training and testing data sets, respectively, Packpred outperforms all methods in all data sets, with the exception of marginally underperforming in comparison to FADHM in the CcdB data set. A meta server analysis was performed that chose best performing methods of wild-type amino acids and for wild-type mutant amino acid pairs. This led to an increase in the MCC value of 0.40 and 0.51 for the two meta predictors, respectively, on the Missense3D data set. We conjecture that it is possible to improve accuracy with better meta predictors as among the seven methods compared, at least one method or another is able to correctly predict ∼99% of the data.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.Aen_US
dc.subjectMissense mutation effect predictionen_US
dc.subjectAmino acid depthen_US
dc.subjectLlocal environment/cliqueen_US
dc.subjectStatistical potentialen_US
dc.subjectMeta predictoren_US
dc.subject2021-SEP-WEEK3en_US
dc.subjectTOC-SEP-2021en_US
dc.subject2021en_US
dc.titlePackpred: Predicting the Functional Effect of Missense Mutationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleFrontiers in Molecular Biosciencesen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.