Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6753
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarman, Subhodeepen_US
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Jagadishen_US
dc.contributor.authorDas, Arnab Kumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorSikdar, Suranjanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBISWAS, ABHIJITen_US
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, Ananthakrishnanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDas, Rahulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T08:11:56Z
dc.date.available2022-04-22T08:11:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nano Research, 72, 81-93.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1662-5250en_US
dc.identifier.issn1661-9897en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4028/p-vv17a6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6753
dc.description.abstractThis article presents a comparative study between the ZnO nanocone and nanofibers. ZnO nanocones were synthesized through the green route, using Azadirachta indica leaf extract media, and ZnO nanofibers were synthesized by the electrospinning process. The microstructural parameters of the prepared nanomaterials were investigated using powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and Rietveld refinement analysis. The XRD patterns confirmed the formation of single-phase ZnO with hexagonal wurtzite structure having an average crystallite size of 21 nm and 54 nm for the conical and fibrous nanoparticles, respectively. The field emission scanning electron microscopy revealed that the mean radius of nanofibers was 25-30 nm while the mean height and mean base radius of nanocones were 181 nm and 91 nm respectively. Elastic properties were estimated using elastic compliances S11 (6.0678×10-12 m2N-1), S12 (-2.2602×10-12 m2N-1), S13 (-1.3579×10-12 m2N-1), S33 (5.5196×10-12 m2N-1) and S44 (22.6833×10-12 m2N-1) which were calculated using the THERMO-PW code, based on the density functional theory. The calculated elastic constants of the two nanostructures yielded similar values as expected. However, the elastic limit of the two nanostructures differs due to their morphological anomaly. Moreover, the optical bandgap of nanofibrous ZnO was lower than that of nanoconical ZnO.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTrans Tech Publications Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectGreen synthesisen_US
dc.subjectNanomaterialsen_US
dc.subjectElectrospinningen_US
dc.subjectRietveld refinementen_US
dc.subjectDensity functional theoryen_US
dc.subject2022-APR-WEEK2en_US
dc.subjectTOC-APR-2022en_US
dc.subject2022en_US
dc.titleComparative Study of ZnO Nanomaterials Synthesized by Green and Electrospinning Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleJournal of Nano Researchen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.