Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7260
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMave, Vidyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSHAIKH, ARSHen_US
dc.contributor.authorMONTEIRO, JOY MERWINen_US
dc.contributor.authorBogam, Prasaden_US
dc.contributor.authorPujari, Bhalchandra S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGupte, Nikhilen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-22T10:55:29Z
dc.date.available2022-07-22T10:55:29Z
dc.date.issued2022-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports, 12, 10446.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14674-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7260
dc.description.abstractAssessing the impact of lockdowns on COVID-19 incidence may provide important lessons for management of pandemic in resource-limited settings. We examined growth of incident confirmed COVID-19 patients before, during and after lockdowns during the first wave in Pune city that reported the largest COVID-19 burden at the peak of the pandemic. Using anonymized individual-level data captured by Pune’s public health surveillance program between February 1st and September 15th 2020, we assessed weekly incident COVID-19 patients, infection rates, and epidemic curves by lockdown status (overall and by sex, age, and population density) and modelled the natural epidemic using the compartmental model. Effect of lockdown on incident patients was assessed using multilevel Poisson regression. We used geospatial mapping to characterize regional spread. Of 241,629 persons tested for SARS-CoV-2, 64,526 (26%) were positive, contributing to an overall rate of COVID-19 disease of 267·0 (95% CI 265·3–268·8) per 1000 persons. The median age of COVID-19 patients was 36 (interquartile range [IQR] 25–50) years, 36,180 (56%) were male, and 9414 (15%) were children < 18 years. Epidemic curves and geospatial mapping showed delayed peak of the patients by approximately 8 weeks during the lockdowns as compared to modelled natural epidemic. Compared to a subsequent unlocking period, incident COVID-19 patients were 43% lower (IRR 0·57, 95% CI 0·53–0·62) during India’s nationwide lockdown and were 22% lower (IRR 0·78, 95% CI 0.73–0.84) during Pune’s regional lockdown and was uniform across age groups and population densities. Both national and regional lockdowns slowed the COVID-19 infection rates in population dense, urban region in India, underscoring its impact on COVID-19 control efforts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.subjectHealth careen_US
dc.subjectHealth policyen_US
dc.subjectHealth servicesen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subject2022-JUL-WEEK2en_US
dc.subjectTOC-JUL-2022en_US
dc.subject2022en_US
dc.titleAssociation of national and regional lockdowns with COVID-19 infection rates in Pune, Indiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleScientific Reportsen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.