Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7366
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWinter-Billington, Alexen_US
dc.contributor.authorDadic, Ruzicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoore, R. D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFlerchinger, Geralden_US
dc.contributor.authorWagnon, Patricken_US
dc.contributor.authorBANERJEE, ARGHAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-21T06:26:48Z
dc.date.available2022-09-21T06:26:48Z
dc.date.issued2022-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Earth Science, 10.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-6463en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.796877en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7366
dc.description.abstractModelling ablation of glacier ice under a layer of mineral debris is increasingly important, because the extent of supraglacial debris is expanding worldwide due to glacier recession. Physically based models have been developed, but the uncertainty in predictions is not yet well constrained. A new one-dimensional model of debris-covered ice ablation that is based on the Simultaneous Heat and Water transfer model is introduced here. SHAW-Glacier is a physically based, vertically integrated, fully coupled, water and energy balance model, which includes the advection of heat by rainwater and lateral flow. SHAW-Glacier was applied to North Changri Nup, a high elevation alpine glacier in the monsoon-dominated Central Himalaya. Simulations were compared with observed debris temperature profiles, snow depth, and ablation stake measurements for debris 0.03–0.41 m thick, in a 2500 m2 study area. Prediction uncertainty was estimated in a Monte Carlo analysis. SHAW-Glacier simulated the characteristic pattern of decreasing ablation with increasing debris thickness. However, the observations of ablation did not follow the characteristic pattern; annual ablation was highest where the debris was thickest. Recursive partitioning revealed a substantial, non-linear sensitivity to the snow threshold air temperature, suggesting a sensitivity to the duration of snow cover. Photographs showed patches of snow persisting through the ablation season, and the observational data were consistent with uneven persistence of snow patches. The analyses indicate that patchy snow cover in the ablation season can overwhelm the sensitivity of sub-debris ablation to debris thickness. Patchy snow cover may be an unquantified source of uncertainty in predictions of sub-debris ablation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.en_US
dc.subjectGlacieren_US
dc.subjectDebrisen_US
dc.subjectAblationen_US
dc.subjectModelen_US
dc.subjectSHAWen_US
dc.subjectPhysically baseden_US
dc.subjectChangri Nupen_US
dc.subject2022-SEP-WEEK1en_US
dc.subjectTOC-SEP-2022en_US
dc.subject2022en_US
dc.titleModelling Debris-Covered Glacier Ablation Using the Simultaneous Heat and Water Transport Model. Part 1: Model Development and Application to North Changri Nupen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Earth and Climate Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleFrontiers in Earth Scienceen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.