Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7853
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKalbande, Riteshen_US
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Bipinen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaji, Sujiten_US
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Ravien_US
dc.contributor.authorATEY, KAUSTUBHen_US
dc.contributor.authorRathore, Devendra Singhen_US
dc.contributor.authorBeig, Gufranen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-15T06:14:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-15T06:14:27Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationChemosphere, 326, 138474.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298en_US
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138474en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7853-
dc.description.abstractThe prediction of surface ozone is essential attributing to its impact on human and environmental health. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are crucial in driving ozone concentration; particularly in urban areas where VOC limited regimes are prominent. The limited measurements of VOCs, however, hinder assessing the VOC-ozone relationship. This work applies machine learning (ML) algorithms for temporal forecasting of surface ozone over a metropolitan city in India. The availability of continuous VOCs measurement data along with meteorology and other pollutants during 2014–2016 makes it possible to deduce the influence of various input parameters on surface ozone prediction. After evaluating the best ML model for ozone prediction, simulations were carried out using varied input combinations. The combination with isoprene, meteorology, NOx, and CO (Isop + MNC) was the best with RMSE 4.41 ppbv and MAPE 6.77%. A season-wise comparison of simulations having all data, only meteorological data and Isop + MNC as input showed that Isop + MNC simulation gives the best results during the summer season (RMSE: 5.86 ppbv, MAPE: 7.05%). This shows the increased ability of the model to capture ozone peaks (high ozone during summer) relatively better when isoprene data is used. The overall results highlight that using all available data doesn't necessarily give best prediction results; also critical thinking is essential when evaluating the model results.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.subjectOzoneen_US
dc.subjectVOCsen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectMeteorologyen_US
dc.subjectIsopreneen_US
dc.subject2023-MAY-WEEK1en_US
dc.subjectTOC-MAY-2023en_US
dc.subject2023en_US
dc.titleMachine learning based quantification of VOC contribution in surface ozone predictionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Chemistryen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleChemosphereen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.