Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8002
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDate, Anuja Anilen_US
dc.contributor.authorHiremath, Ankila J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Atul Arvinden_US
dc.contributor.authorLELE, SHARACHCHANDRAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-26T11:29:44Z
dc.date.available2023-05-26T11:29:44Z
dc.date.issued2023-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationEconomic Botany,77, 135–152.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-0001en_US
dc.identifier.issn1874-9364en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-023-09572-zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8002
dc.description.abstractNon-timber forest products (NTFPs) are known to provide livelihoods for forest-based communities across the world. While ensuring the sustainability of NTFP harvests is a key challenge, optimizing the production of NTFPs through appropriate silvicultural practices is also critical for forest-based economies. In Central India, the suitability of fire or pruning practices for enhancing the production of leaves of the tendu tree (Diospyros melanoxylon) has been much debated. While villagers commonly adopt annual litter fires, the state Forest Department urges leaf collectors to adopt the more labor-intensive practice of pruning. On the other hand, conservationists recommend completely hands-off management (no fire or pruning). In this study, we compared leaf production from the competing practices of litter fire, pruning, pruning-with-fire, and hands-off management, that are experimented with in community-managed forests. We checked for confounding factors such as tree canopy cover, presence of tendu trees, and inherent differences in forest type. We conducted the study during the pre-harvest season from March to May 2020 in villages in the northern Gadchiroli district of Maharashtra, India. We found that pruning and pruning-with-fire lead to higher root sprout production and, in turn, higher leaf production per unit area when compared to litter fire and the control (no pruning or fire). Fire alone led to a negative impact on leaf production. Implementing pruning instead of litter fire, however, comes with labor costs. Its adoption is therefore linked with the institutional arrangements for tendu management and marketing that shape community perception of costs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.subjectNTFPen_US
dc.subjectLeaf productionen_US
dc.subjectFireen_US
dc.subjectPruningen_US
dc.subjectCentral Indiaen_US
dc.subject2023-MAY-WEEK3en_US
dc.subjectTOC-MAY-2023en_US
dc.subject2023en_US
dc.titleSilvicultural Practices in the Management of Diospyros melanoxylon (Tendu) Leaf Production: Options and Trade-offsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleEconomic Botanyen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.