Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8327
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorZhang, Hanzhe-
dc.contributor.authorCHEBIYYAM, VENKATARAM-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-15T07:24:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-15T07:24:39Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.citation47en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8327-
dc.description.abstractWe explore the bargaining game beginning with cooperative games, following the Nash Bargaining Solution and understanding the axiomatic approach, and its impact, followed by the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution which also follows the static axiomatic approach. After this, we move over to the realm of non-cooperative games to study the Rubinstein bargaining model which follows a dynamic strategic approach. We see how the Nash and Rubinstein solutions, though different approaches, are connected, and can be combined for applications to problems in the process. Finally, we examine the results of Reputational Bargaining put out by Dilip Abreu and Faruk Gul in the seminal paper on the field, studying the various results and insights they provide to the continuous time incomplete information bargaining model.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGame Theroyen_US
dc.subjectBargainingen_US
dc.subjectReputational Bargainingen_US
dc.titleBargaining in Game Theoryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.embargoNo Embargoen_US
dc.type.degreeBS-MSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Mathematicsen_US
dc.contributor.registration20181045en_US
Appears in Collections:MS THESES

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20181045_CHEBIYYAM_VENKATARAM_MS_Thesis.pdfMS Thesis394.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.