Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8359
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMAJUMDAR, SAYANTANen_US
dc.contributor.authorKalamkar, Saurabh D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDudhgaonkar, Shashikanten_US
dc.contributor.authorShelgikar, Kishor M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGhaskadbi, Sarojen_US
dc.contributor.authorGOEL, PRANAYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T11:03:17Z
dc.date.available2023-12-19T11:03:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Endocrinology, 14.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-2392en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1264072en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8359
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The development of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) over the last decade has provided access to many consecutive glucose concentration measurements from patients. A standard method for estimating glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), already established in the literature, is based on its relationship with the average blood glucose concentration (aBG). We showed that the estimates obtained using the standard method were not sufficiently reliable for an Indian population and suggested two new methods for estimating HbA1c.Methods: Two datasets providing a total of 128 CGM and their corresponding HbA1c levels were received from two centers: Health Centre, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune and Joshi Hospital, Pune, from patients already diagnosed with diabetes, non-diabetes, and pre-diabetes. We filtered 112 data-sufficient CGM traces, of which 80 traces were used to construct two models using linear regression. The first model estimates HbA1c directly from the average interstitial fluid glucose concentration (aISF) of the CGM trace and the second model proceeds in two steps: first, aISF is scaled to aBG, and then aBG is converted to HbA1c via the Nathan model. Our models were tested on the remaining 32 data- sufficient traces. We also provided 95% confidence and prediction intervals for HbA1c estimates.Results: The direct model (first model) for estimating HbA1c was HbA1cmmol/mol = 0.319 × aISFmg/dL + 16.73 and the adapted Nathan model (second model) for estimating HbA1c is HbA1cmmol/dL = 0.38 × (1.17 × ISFmg/dL) − 5.60.Discussion: Our results show that the new equations are likely to provide better estimates of HbA1c levels than the standard model at the population level, which is especially suited for clinical epidemiology in Indian populations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.en_US
dc.subjectContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM)en_US
dc.subjectGlycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)en_US
dc.subjectType 2 diabetes (T2D)en_US
dc.subjectAverage blood glucose concentration (aBG)en_US
dc.subjectAverage interstitial fluid glucose concentration (aISF)en_US
dc.subject2023-DEC-WEEK1en_US
dc.subjectTOC-DEC-2023en_US
dc.subject2023en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of HbA1c from CGM traces in an Indian populationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleFrontiers in Endocrinologyen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.