Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9088
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHa, Joonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Joon Youngen_US
dc.contributor.authorSpringer, Maxen_US
dc.contributor.authorCHHABRA, AARYANen_US
dc.contributor.authorChung, Stephanie T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSumner, Anne E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSherman, Arthur S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArslanian, Silvaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T04:03:52Z
dc.date.available2024-09-20T04:03:52Z
dc.date.issued2024-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, dgae582.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1945-7197en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-972Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae582en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9088
dc.description.abstractContext The gold-standard clamp measurements for insulin sensitivity (cSI), β-cell function (cBCF), and disposition index (cDI = cSI × cBCF) are not practical in large-scale studies.ObjectiveWe sought to 1) validate a mathematical model-derived DI from oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) with insulin (mDI) and without (mDI-woI) against cDI and oral disposition index (oDI) and 2) evaluate the ability of the novel indices to detect prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsWe carried out a secondary analysis of previously reported cross-sectional observational studies. The Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion mathematical model for glucose-insulin dynamics was applied to 5-point and 3-point OGTTs synchronized with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps from 130 youth with obesity (68 normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 33 impaired glucose tolerance [IGT], 29 T2D).ResultsModel-derived DI correlated well with clamp DI (R = 0.76 [logged]). Between NGT and IGT, mDI and mDI-woI decreased more than oDI and cDI, (60% and 59% vs 29% and 27%), and by receiver operating characteristic analysis were superior at detecting IGT compared with oDI and cDI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.88-0.87 vs 0.68-0.65), as was mean glucose (AUC 0.87).ConclusionmDI-woI is better than oDI or the labor-intensive cDI for detecting dysglycemia in obese youth. Bypassing insulin measurements with mDI-woI from the OGTT provides a cost-effective approach for large-scale epidemiological studies of dysglycemia in youth.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectInsulin resistanceen_US
dc.subjectβ-cell functionen_US
dc.subjectDisposition indexen_US
dc.subjectOral glucose tolerance testen_US
dc.subjectHyperinsulinemic euglycemic clampen_US
dc.subjecthyperglycemic clampen_US
dc.subject2024en_US
dc.subject2024-SEP-WEEK3en_US
dc.subjectTOC-SEP-2024en_US
dc.titleA Mathematical Model-Derived Disposition Index Without Insulin Validated in Youth With Obesityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolismen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
Appears in Collections:JOURNAL ARTICLES

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.