Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9088
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ha, Joon | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Joon Young | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Springer, Max | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | CHHABRA, AARYAN | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Stephanie T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sumner, Anne E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sherman, Arthur S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Arslanian, Silva | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-20T04:03:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-20T04:03:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, dgae582. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1945-7197 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-972X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae582 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9088 | |
dc.description.abstract | Context The gold-standard clamp measurements for insulin sensitivity (cSI), β-cell function (cBCF), and disposition index (cDI = cSI × cBCF) are not practical in large-scale studies.ObjectiveWe sought to 1) validate a mathematical model-derived DI from oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) with insulin (mDI) and without (mDI-woI) against cDI and oral disposition index (oDI) and 2) evaluate the ability of the novel indices to detect prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsWe carried out a secondary analysis of previously reported cross-sectional observational studies. The Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion mathematical model for glucose-insulin dynamics was applied to 5-point and 3-point OGTTs synchronized with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps from 130 youth with obesity (68 normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 33 impaired glucose tolerance [IGT], 29 T2D).ResultsModel-derived DI correlated well with clamp DI (R = 0.76 [logged]). Between NGT and IGT, mDI and mDI-woI decreased more than oDI and cDI, (60% and 59% vs 29% and 27%), and by receiver operating characteristic analysis were superior at detecting IGT compared with oDI and cDI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.88-0.87 vs 0.68-0.65), as was mean glucose (AUC 0.87).ConclusionmDI-woI is better than oDI or the labor-intensive cDI for detecting dysglycemia in obese youth. Bypassing insulin measurements with mDI-woI from the OGTT provides a cost-effective approach for large-scale epidemiological studies of dysglycemia in youth. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_US |
dc.subject | Insulin resistance | en_US |
dc.subject | β-cell function | en_US |
dc.subject | Disposition index | en_US |
dc.subject | Oral glucose tolerance test | en_US |
dc.subject | Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp | en_US |
dc.subject | hyperglycemic clamp | en_US |
dc.subject | 2024 | en_US |
dc.subject | 2024-SEP-WEEK3 | en_US |
dc.subject | TOC-SEP-2024 | en_US |
dc.title | A Mathematical Model-Derived Disposition Index Without Insulin Validated in Youth With Obesity | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Biology | en_US |
dc.identifier.sourcetitle | Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | en_US |
dc.publication.originofpublisher | Foreign | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | JOURNAL ARTICLES |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.