Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9264
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRINURAGAVI, V. N.
dc.contributor.authorBiswasharma, Rupraj
dc.contributor.authorUmakanth, N.
dc.contributor.authorPawar, Sunil D.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T04:56:29Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T04:56:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.identifier.citationPresented in the "Workshop on Data Assimilation in Weather and Climate Models" at International Center for Theoretical Science (ICTS), Bangalore, 06 - 17 May, 2024.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9264
dc.descriptionThis work was presented as a poster at the 'Workshop on Data Assimilation in Weather and Climate Models' held at the International Center for Theoretical Science (ICTS), Bangalore, from May 6 to 17, 2024.en
dc.description.abstractLightning is an electrical discharge influenced by various cloud microphysical processes like cloud droplet formation and ice crystal growth within a thundercloud. Microphysics Parameterisation (MP) schemes of the Weather and Research Forecasting (WRF) model are responsible for representing cloud droplet formation, ice crystal formation and precipitation formation. Evaluating the performance of different MP schemes is crucial for accurate lightning prediction. A severe thunderstorm event on May 22, 2022, over the Kerala region, which recorded a peak 30-minute flash count of ~1200 flashes observed by the Indian Lightning Location Network (ILLN), has been simulated in the WRF model. Three Microphysics (MP) schemes: Thompson, Morrison, and WDM6, have been tested using three nested domains (27 km, 9 km, 3km), and the output of the 3km domain has been analyzed. WDM6 and Morrison schemes have been found to match the observed lightning distribution (both spatially and temporally, with WDM6 capturing flash magnitude). All tested microphysics schemes underestimate the number of lightning flashes compared to observations. While all microphysics schemes captured similar trends in CAPE, there were slight differences in the simulated magnitudes. The vertical distribution of CAPE also showed minimal variation between the different schemes. Further research is ongoing to understand how thermodynamic parameters beyond CAPE, microphysical processes, and dynamical factors influencing cloud development and electrification contribute to discrepancies between simulated and observed lightning.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectThunderstormsen_US
dc.subjectLightningen_US
dc.subjectConvective Available Potential Energy (CAPE)en_US
dc.subjectMicrophysicsen_US
dc.subjectWRF modelen_US
dc.subject2024en_US
dc.titleEvaluating microphysics schemes of WRF model in simulating Lightning and Thunderstorm event over Keralaen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.type.degreeBS-MSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Earth and Climate Scienceen_US
dc.application.code
Appears in Collections:POSTER PRESENTATIONS



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.