Digital Repository

Substrate viscoelasticity regulates fibroblast adhesion and migration

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Paddillaya, Neha en_US
dc.contributor.author Rao, Akshar en_US
dc.contributor.author Shrivastava, Anshul en_US
dc.contributor.author Jamir, Imnatoshi en_US
dc.contributor.author SENGUPTA, KUNDAN en_US
dc.contributor.author Gundiah, Namrata en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2025-08-29T09:52:42Z
dc.date.available 2025-08-29T09:52:42Z
dc.date.issued 2025-07 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Biointerphases, 20(04). en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1559-4106 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1934-8630 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0004585 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10377
dc.description.abstract Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) modulate cell–substrate interactions and influence cellular behaviors such as contractility, migration, and proliferation. Although the effects of substrate stiffness on mechanobiology have been well studied, the role of ECM viscoelasticity in fibrotic progression remains less understood. To examine how viscoelasticity affects the biophysical properties and regulates signaling of human mammary fibroblasts, we engineered elastic (E) and viscoelastic (VE) polyacrylamide hydrogels with comparable storage moduli (∼14.52 ± 1.03 kPa) but distinctly different loss moduli; mean loss moduli for VE gels was 36.9% higher at 0.05 Hz than E gels. Fibroblasts cultured on E hydrogels spread extensively (2428.93 ± 864.71 μm2), developed prominent stress fibers with higher zyxin intensity, and generated higher traction stresses (2931.57 ± 1732.61 Pa). In contrast, fibroblasts on VE substrates had 54.2% smaller focal adhesion areas, exhibited 51.8% lower critical adhesion strengths, and generated 21% lower traction stresses (p < 0.001). These substrates also promoted migration and showed enhanced proliferation with reduced Yes-associated protein (YAP) activity, suggesting a mechanotransduction shift that may involve alternative signaling pathways. In contrast, E substrates showed YAP nuclear translocation, consistent with greater cytoskeletal tension and contractility. These findings highlight the importance of energy dissipation mechanisms in regulating fibroblast function on substrates mimicking the fibrotic milieu. Our results demonstrate that tuning the ECM viscoelasticity is a useful strategy to regulate cell behaviors in tissue-engineered scaffolds and develop better disease modeling for regenerative medicine. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher AIP Publishing en_US
dc.subject Stiffness en_US
dc.subject Proliferation en_US
dc.subject Elasticity en_US
dc.subject Fibrosis en_US
dc.subject Modulus en_US
dc.subject Culture en_US
dc.subject Yap/Taz en_US
dc.subject Growth en_US
dc.subject Cells en_US
dc.subject Zyxin en_US
dc.subject 2025-AUG-WEEK4 en_US
dc.subject TOC-AUG-2025 en_US
dc.subject 2025 en_US
dc.title Substrate viscoelasticity regulates fibroblast adhesion and migration en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.contributor.department Dept. of Biology en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitle Biointerphases en_US
dc.publication.originofpublisher Foreign en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account