| dc.contributor.advisor | Villa, Stefano | |
| dc.contributor.author | KURPATI RAGHAVENDRA, KISHAN | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-14T11:54:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-14T11:54:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 76 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10978 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Epithelial monolayers serve fundamental physiological roles in development, homeostasis, and disease; yet how collective cell dynamics and substrate mechanics coordinate to drive three-dimensional morphogenesis remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate how substrate mechanics and pharmacological modulation of cell motility and contractility influence monolayer dynamics, dome formation kinetics, and cell adhesion in MDCKII epithelial cells. Using epifluorescence and spinning disk confocal microscopy, we tracked monolayer dynamics and dome formation on glass, PDMS, and uniform or micropatterned protein coatings. Quantitative analysis of velocity fields revealed a transient motility peak 55-67 hours post-seeding. HGF increased peak velocities in a dose-dependent manner, while blebbistatin suppressed motility and contractility without altering adhesion strength. Blebbistatin-treated cells formed smaller domes that collapsed gradually rather than suddenly, with rapid dome turnover and shorter lifetimes. In contrast, PDMS—which reduces adhesion while increasing motility—produced larger domes with collapse dynamics similar to controls. Confocal imaging revealed that dome collapse involves transient loss of actin stress fibers in dome cells, which are then pulled outward by contractile neighbors before repolarizing and migrating back—a recovery abolished by blebbistatin. Centrifugation-based adhesion assays quantified substrate-specific detachment thresholds.[SV1.1][KK1.2] These findings reveal that monolayer motility and dome kinetics are governed by interplay between actomyosin contractility, cell motility, and substrate adhesion, with implications for understanding epithelial morphogenesis, tissue mechanics, and biomaterial design. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | I am immensely thankful to my supervisor and guide, Dr. Stefano Villa, for his continuous and consistent feedback and input on all my experiments. I also thank him for several of the analyses credited to him in this thesis. I am grateful to Sidharth Das, a friend and labmate, for his valuable feedback. I am deeply grateful to the lab technicians—Ms. Katharina Gunkel, Ms. Maren Stella Müller, and Ms. Lara Ständer—for taking care of the cells and the lab, and for their weekly assistance with my experiments. I acknowledge the Machine Shop at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPI-DS), and particularly Mr. Andy Heil, for helping us build our custom cell adhesion assay setup. I am thankful to Dr. Mišo Mitkovski and Mr. Heiko Röhse for their expertise and technical assistance at the Facility for Light Microscopy at the Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences (MPI-NAT), City Campus, for multiphoton and confocal microscopy. I also thank the Facility for Light Microscopy for access to software tools such as Arivis and Nikon NIS Elements for analysis. I would also like to thank Ms. Angela Gremmel at MPI-DS for helping with all the bureaucracy in Germany and MPI-DS. I thank MPI-DS and the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, for the opportunity to pursue this master's thesis, and MPI-DS for financial support for my stay. I acknowledge the receipt of the Kishore Vaigyanik Protsahan Yojana (KVPY) fellowship. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | mechanobiology | en_US |
| dc.subject | tissue morphogenesis | en_US |
| dc.subject | third harmonic generation (THG) | en_US |
| dc.subject | second harmonic generation (SHG) | en_US |
| dc.subject | micropatterning | en_US |
| dc.subject | fluid shear stress | en_US |
| dc.subject | cell-substrate adhesion | en_US |
| dc.subject | Epithelial mechanics | en_US |
| dc.subject | MDCKII cells | en_US |
| dc.subject | dome formation | en_US |
| dc.subject | autofluorescence | en_US |
| dc.subject | cell motility | en_US |
| dc.subject | actomyosin contractility | en_US |
| dc.subject | blebbistatin | en_US |
| dc.subject | PDMS | en_US |
| dc.title | Understanding the Role of Cellular Dynamics in MDCKII Domes Formation | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en_US |
| dc.description.embargo | No Embargo | en_US |
| dc.type.degree | BS-MS | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Biology | en_US |
| dc.contributor.registration | 20211273 | en_US |