Digital Repository

Elephant taking the lion's share: Political ecology of elephant conservation and human-elephant conflict in Eastern India

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author ROY, AKASHDEEP en_US
dc.contributor.author SHARMA, SHALINI en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2026-06-30T04:15:38Z
dc.date.available 2026-06-30T04:15:38Z
dc.date.issued 2026-06 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Political Ecology, 33(01). en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1073-045 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.6435 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11327
dc.description.abstract This article explores the more-than-human political ecology of human-elephant conflict in North Bengal, India, by emphasizing Asian elephants' (Elephas maximus) agency within a complex conservation landscape. Through a combination of ethnographic fieldwork, environmental history analysis, and camera traps, this article examines the dynamic and often contentious relationships between elephants and humans throughout precolonial, colonial, and postcolonial periods to comprehend the current complexities. We challenge the dominant conservation narratives that represent elephants as mere victims or as symbolic species, and instead frame them as political actors who adapt to, co-create, and subvert the socio-ecological realities of this shared space. Elephants in North Bengal intentionally adapt to human activities of 'weak' retaliation, modify local agricultural practices, and strategically breach electric fences to access better nutrition—behaviors reflecting cultural learning, adaptive intelligence, and interspecies negotiation. Their heightened status under the contemporary conservation regime has contributed to uneven political geographies, wherein the less-than-human local communities experience increased crop depredation, property damage, and human fatalities, frequented with unfair compensation or poor representation in decision-making. This article highlights the historical intertwining and mutual constitution of elephant and human agencies, shaped by their shared experiences of subordination, displacement, resistance, and protection. It advocates for a shift in the conservation framework—from human exceptionalism and spatial binaries to models that balance power asymmetries, relational ontologies, and multispecies justice. Recognizing the elephant's subjective agency is crucial for developing more empathetic human-elephant conflict strategies and for restoring socio-ecological balance in a landscape that is becoming increasingly politicized against the local residents. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Arizona Libraries en_US
dc.subject Asian elephants en_US
dc.subject Political animal en_US
dc.subject Wildlife conservation en_US
dc.subject More-than-human political ecology en_US
dc.subject Nonhuman subjective agency en_US
dc.subject Marginalized communities en_US
dc.subject 2026-JUN-WEEK4 en_US
dc.subject TOC-JUN-2026 en_US
dc.subject 2026 en_US
dc.title Elephant taking the lion's share: Political ecology of elephant conservation and human-elephant conflict in Eastern India en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.contributor.department Dept. of Humanities and Social Sciences en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitle Journal of Political Ecology en_US
dc.publication.originofpublisher Foreign en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account