Digital Repository

Relations among different inequality measures in complex systems: From kinetic exchange to earthquake models

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author SEN, SHOHINI en_US
dc.contributor.author Banerjee, Suchismita en_US
dc.contributor.author Chakrabarti, Bikas K. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2026-07-20T09:48:15Z
dc.date.available 2026-07-20T09:48:15Z
dc.date.issued 2026-06 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Physical Review E, 113, 064308. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2470-0053 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2470-0045 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1103/vnpc-zw1v en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11357
dc.description.abstract We present a numerical study of several inequality measures across two kinetic wealth-exchange models with extreme inequality features (namely the Banerjee model, and the Chakraborti or yard-sale model) and two earthquake simulating models (namely the Chakrabarti-Stinchcombe two-fractal overlap model and the nonlinear dynamical Burridge-Knopoff model). For each model we compute numerically the Lorenz function for the respective models' wealth, overlap magnitude or avalanche distributions. We then estimate the variations of Gini (𝑔), Pietra (𝑝), and Kolkata (𝑘) indices in these models with systematic variations of saving propensity (for the two wealth-exchange models), with systematic variations of generation or block numbers (for the two earthquake simulating models). We find that for appropriate values of the respective model parameters, the inequality indices 𝑔 and 𝑘 in corresponding the distributions (of “wealth” or “avalanche”) show quantitatively similar behavior, namely 𝑔=𝑘≃0.86, which was identified earlier to correspond to the precursor point of criticality in self-organized critical models (𝑘=0.80 corresponds to that for Pareto's 80-20 law). The values of 𝑝/(2⁢𝑘−1) in all these (wealth exchange and earthquake) models remain a little above unity, as was predicted theoretically. These observations for the inequality indices 𝑔, 𝑘, and 𝑝 across the socioeconomic and geophysical models indicate the presence of unifying subtle features in the statistics of such disparate dynamical systems. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Physical Society en_US
dc.subject Complex systems en_US
dc.subject Econophysics en_US
dc.subject Geophysics en_US
dc.subject Physics & society en_US
dc.subject 2026-JUL-WEEK2 en_US
dc.subject TOC-JUL-2026 en_US
dc.subject 2026 en_US
dc.title Relations among different inequality measures in complex systems: From kinetic exchange to earthquake models en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.contributor.department Dept. of Physics en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitle Physical Review E en_US
dc.publication.originofpublisher Foreign en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account