Digital Repository

Complementary approaches to identify, characterize and prioritize invasive plants in a biodiversity hotspot

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author OJHA, MEGHA en_US
dc.contributor.author INGALE, AKANKSHA en_US
dc.contributor.author NERLEKAR, ASHISH N. en_US
dc.contributor.author CHAVAN, BHANUDAS P. en_US
dc.contributor.author Thorat, Ovee en_US
dc.contributor.author Agarwal, Prerna en_US
dc.contributor.author Datar, Mandar N. en_US
dc.contributor.author BARUA, DEEPAK en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2026-08-04T11:31:06Z
dc.date.available 2026-08-04T11:31:06Z
dc.date.issued 2026-07 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Invasive Plant Science and Management en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1939-7291 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1939-747X en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2026.10055 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11386
dc.description.abstract Prioritising invasive species is crucial for managing invasions and mitigating impacts on biodiversity globally, yet most efforts are concentrated in the Global North, with significant gaps in the Global South. In the absence of region-specific assessments, land managers in the Global South often rely on broad global priority frameworks, whose relevance at smaller spatial scales remains uncertain. In addition to of spatial scale, robust prioritisation frameworks should incorporate multiple dimensions of species distribution and impact. To help fill this gap, in this study we used complementary approaches: herbarium-based and expert assessments to evaluate the distribution and impact of invasive plant species in a biodiversity hotspot in India. We scored species across different dimensions of impact, and generated a composite score that was used to rank and prioritise the invasive species. To understand the concordance of rankings across scales, we compared our regional rankings with national and global rankings for these species. We identified seventy-nine invasive plant species in the Northern Western Ghats and Konkan region, which revealed a ten-fold difference in their spatial extent. Expert assessments indicated that only few species had high scores across the different distribution and impact dimensions, while most had low to moderate scores. The results show that distribution-related dimensions were correlated, but impact-associated dimensions remained independent, highlighting the need to include both in prioritisation frameworks. Although most regional species were included in national and global invasive species lists, their priority rankings differed at these different scales. Overall, our study underscores the importance of integrating both distribution and impact dimensions for species prioritisation and highlights the importance of local-scale assessments for effective invasive species management. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press en_US
dc.subject Invasive plants en_US
dc.subject Prioritisation en_US
dc.subject Herbarium en_US
dc.subject Expert assessments en_US
dc.subject Biodiversity hotspot en_US
dc.subject 2026-JUL-WEEK3 en_US
dc.subject TOC-JUL-2026 en_US
dc.subject 2026 en_US
dc.title Complementary approaches to identify, characterize and prioritize invasive plants in a biodiversity hotspot en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.contributor.department Dept. of Biology en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitle Invasive Plant Science and Management en_US
dc.publication.originofpublisher Foreign en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account