Contrasting reactivity of (boryl)(aryl)lithium-amide with electrophiles: N- vs. p-aryl-C-nucleophilic substitution

dc.contributor.author	BOOMISHANKAR, RAMAMOORTHY	en_US
dc.contributor.author	VIJAYAKANTH, THANGAVEL	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Dhara, Debabrata et al.	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2019-09-11T05:05:24Z
dc.date.available	2019-09-11T05:05:24Z
dc.date.issued	2018-09	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Dalton Transactions, 47(41), 14411-14415.	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1477-9226	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1477-9234	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4052
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.1039/C8DT03201G	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Herein we report two different reactivity modes of lithium(aryl)(boryl)amide, 4, when it is reacted with chlorosilanes such as SiCl4 and MeSiHCl2, and chlorophosphine, Ph2PCl. Thus, the reaction of lithium(aryl)(boryl)amide, 4, with MeSiHCl2 leads exclusively to an N-substitution product, 6. On the other hand, the reaction of 4 with SiCl4 and Ph2PCl proceeds completely differently affording exclusively p-aryl-C-substitution products, 5 and 7, respectively.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Royal Society of Chemistry	en_US
dc.subject	Organometallic chemistry	en_US
dc.subject	Lanthanide chemistry	en_US
dc.subject	Silicon and Phosphorus	en_US
dc.subject	2018	en_US
dc.title	Contrasting reactivity of (boryl)(aryl)lithium-amide with electrophiles: N- vs. p-aryl-C-nucleophilic substitution	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US
dc.contributor.department	Dept. of Chemistry	en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitle	Dalton Transactions	en_US
dc.publication.originofpublisher	Foreign	en_US