dc.contributor.author |
KHARE, AVINASH |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-10-19T09:00:10Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-10-19T09:00:10Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013-10 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Resonance, 18(10), 885–896. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
- |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5197 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-013-0115-2 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
In this article I shall present a brief review of the hundred-year young Bohr model of the atom. In particular, I will ¯rst introduce the Thomson and the Rutherford models of atoms, their shortcomings and then discuss in some detail the development of the atomic model by Niels Bohr. Further, I will mention its re¯nements at the hand of Sommerfeld and also its shortcomings. Finally, I will discuss the implication of this model in the development of quantum mechanics. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Indian Academy of Sciences |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Plum pudding model |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Rutherford atom |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Balmer series |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Rydberg formula |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Star ζ Puppis |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Characteristic X-rays |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Bohr-Sommerfeld approach |
en_US |
dc.subject |
2013 |
en_US |
dc.title |
One hundred years of Bohr model |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.contributor.department |
Dept. of Physics |
en_US |
dc.identifier.sourcetitle |
Resonance |
en_US |
dc.publication.originofpublisher |
Indian |
en_US |