Digital Repository

Computer vision detects inflammatory arthritis in standardized smartphone photographs in an Indian patient cohort

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Phatak, Sanat en_US
dc.contributor.author CHAKRABORTY, SOMASHREE en_US
dc.contributor.author GOEL, PRANAY en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-19T11:01:31Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-19T11:01:31Z
dc.date.issued 2023-11 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Frontiers in Medicine, 10. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2296-858X en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1280462 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8338
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Computer vision extracts meaning from pixelated images and holds promise in automating various clinical tasks. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a deep learning network used therein, have shown promise in analyzing X-ray images and joint photographs. We studied the performance of a CNN on standardized smartphone photographs in detecting inflammation in three hand joints and compared it to a rheumatologist’s diagnosis.Methods: We enrolled 100 consecutive patients with inflammatory arthritis with an onset period of less than 2 years, excluding those with deformities. Each patient was examined by a rheumatologist, and the presence of synovitis in each joint was recorded. Hand photographs were taken in a standardized manner, anonymized, and cropped to include joints of interest. A ResNet-101 backbone modified for two class outputs (inflamed or not) was used for training. We also tested a hue-augmented dataset. We reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for three joints: wrist, index finger proximal interphalangeal (IFPIP), and middle finger proximal interphalangeal (MFPIP), taking the rheumatologist’s opinion as the gold standard.Results: The cohort consisted of 100 individuals, of which 22 of them were men, with a mean age of 49.7 (SD 12.9) years. The majority of the cohort (n = 68, 68%) had rheumatoid arthritis. The wrist (125/200, 62.5%), MFPIP (94/200, 47%), and IFPIP (83/200, 41.5%) were the three most commonly inflamed joints. The CNN achieved the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting synovitis in the MFPIP (83, 77, and 88%, respectively), followed by the IFPIP (74, 74, and 75%, respectively) and the wrist (62, 90, and 21%, respectively).Discussion: We have demonstrated that computer vision was able to detect inflammation in three joints of the hand with reasonable accuracy on standardized photographs despite a small dataset. Feature engineering was not required, and the CNN worked despite a diversity in clinical diagnosis. Larger datasets are likely to improve accuracy and help explain the basis of classification. These data suggest a potential use of computer vision in screening and follow-up of inflammatory arthritis. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Frontiers Media S.A. en_US
dc.subject Artificial intelligence en_US
dc.subject Inflammatory arthritis en_US
dc.subject Digital health en_US
dc.subject Computer vision en_US
dc.subject Screening en_US
dc.subject 2023-DEC-WEEK1 en_US
dc.subject TOC-DEC-2023 en_US
dc.subject 2023 en_US
dc.title Computer vision detects inflammatory arthritis in standardized smartphone photographs in an Indian patient cohort en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.contributor.department Dept. of Biology en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitle Frontiers in Medicine en_US
dc.publication.originofpublisher Foreign en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account