Digital Repository

Error propagation and model update analysis in three-dimensional CSEM inversion

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author DEHIYA, RAHUL en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-29T11:31:13Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-29T11:31:13Z
dc.date.issued 2024-07 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Geophysical Journal International en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1365-246X en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae251 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9028
dc.description.abstract This study examines error propagation from data space to model space during three-dimensional inversion of controlled-source electromagnetic data using a Gauss-Newton based algorithm. An expression for model parameter correction is obtained using higher-order generalised singular value decomposition for various regularisation strategies. Inverse modelling is performed for different types of noise employing distinct regularisation schemes to investigate the impact of error. Data corrupted with random noise suggests that the random noise mainly propagates when regularisation parameters are small, owing to the high-frequency nature of random noise. Furthermore, the random noise predominantly causes artefacts in the shallower part of the inverted model. However, it has little impact on the estimation of major anomalies because the anomaly primarily depends on the smoothly varying parts of data. These observations are valid for both isotropic and anisotropic inversions. Resistive geological anomalies, like vertical dyke or vertical fractures, may pose a significant challenge for isotropic inversion in terms of convergence and data fit, even if the subsurface is isotropic. On the other hand, anisotropic inversion performs remarkably well in such cases, showing faster convergence and better data fit than isotropic inversion. Anisotropic inversion is indispensable in the case of an anisotropic host medium, as isotropic inversion produces significant artefacts and poorer data fit. Numerical experiments suggest that, in general, anisotropic inversion produces relatively better data fit and faster convergence, even in the case of isotropic subsurface. However, due to the varying degree of sensitivity of CSEM data on thin resistive bodies, caution is required in interpreting an anisotropy obtained using anisotropic inversion. An investigation of field data also supports the observations obtained using synthetic experiments. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Oxford University Press en_US
dc.subject Numerical approximations and analysis en_US
dc.subject Inverse theory en_US
dc.subject Controlled source electromagnetics (CSEM) en_US
dc.subject 2024 en_US
dc.subject 2024-JUL-WEEK4 en_US
dc.subject TOC-JUL-2024 en_US
dc.title Error propagation and model update analysis in three-dimensional CSEM inversion en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.contributor.department Dept. of Earth and Climate Science en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitle Geophysical Journal International en_US
dc.publication.originofpublisher Foreign en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account