dc.contributor.author |
Ha, Joon |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Kim, Joon Young |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Springer, Max |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
CHHABRA, AARYAN |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Chung, Stephanie T. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Sumner, Anne E. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Sherman, Arthur S. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Arslanian, Silva |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-09-20T04:03:52Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-09-20T04:03:52Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024-08 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, dgae582. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1945-7197 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0021-972X |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae582 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9088 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Context The gold-standard clamp measurements for insulin sensitivity (cSI), β-cell function (cBCF), and disposition index (cDI = cSI × cBCF) are not practical in large-scale studies.ObjectiveWe sought to 1) validate a mathematical model-derived DI from oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) with insulin (mDI) and without (mDI-woI) against cDI and oral disposition index (oDI) and 2) evaluate the ability of the novel indices to detect prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsWe carried out a secondary analysis of previously reported cross-sectional observational studies. The Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion mathematical model for glucose-insulin dynamics was applied to 5-point and 3-point OGTTs synchronized with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps from 130 youth with obesity (68 normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 33 impaired glucose tolerance [IGT], 29 T2D).ResultsModel-derived DI correlated well with clamp DI (R = 0.76 [logged]). Between NGT and IGT, mDI and mDI-woI decreased more than oDI and cDI, (60% and 59% vs 29% and 27%), and by receiver operating characteristic analysis were superior at detecting IGT compared with oDI and cDI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.88-0.87 vs 0.68-0.65), as was mean glucose (AUC 0.87).ConclusionmDI-woI is better than oDI or the labor-intensive cDI for detecting dysglycemia in obese youth. Bypassing insulin measurements with mDI-woI from the OGTT provides a cost-effective approach for large-scale epidemiological studies of dysglycemia in youth. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Oxford University Press |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Insulin resistance |
en_US |
dc.subject |
β-cell function |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Disposition index |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Oral glucose tolerance test |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp |
en_US |
dc.subject |
hyperglycemic clamp |
en_US |
dc.subject |
2024 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
2024-SEP-WEEK3 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
TOC-SEP-2024 |
en_US |
dc.title |
A Mathematical Model-Derived Disposition Index Without Insulin Validated in Youth With Obesity |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.contributor.department |
Dept. of Biology |
en_US |
dc.identifier.sourcetitle |
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism |
en_US |
dc.publication.originofpublisher |
Foreign |
en_US |